A) European courts are in total disagreement with the reluctance of American courts to interfere with a contract because the value of the item in question has changed since the agreement.
B) European courts refuse to assume that parties accept the risk when they make a contract that the value might change later.
C) European courts permit rescission of the contract for a mistake of value when the mistake involves more than 10 percent of the value at the time of the contract.
D) European courts permit rescission of the contract for a mistake of value when the mistake involves more than 40 percent of the value at the time of the contract.
E) European courts permit rescission of the contract for a mistake of value when the mistake involves more than 50 percent of the value at the time of the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Duress
B) Undue influence
C) Durable fraud
D) Criminal influence
E) Coercion
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Bilateral assent
B) A special agreement
C) Legal assent
D) Contractual affirmance
E) Legal affirmance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Peter may rescind the contract on grounds of fraud or on grounds of duress.
B) Peter may rescind the contract on grounds of duress or on grounds of unconscionability.
C) Peter may rescind the contract on grounds of undue influence or on grounds of duress.
D) Peter may rescind the contract on the ground that although he is past the age of majority, he is still a student.
E) Peter may not rescind the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Duress
B) Unconscionability
C) Fraud
D) Undue influence
E) Consumer misbehavior
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Free will
B) Knowledge
C) Specifics
D) Consideration
E) Realization
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That a unilateral mistake was involved and that courts typically allow relief in situations involving unilateral mistakes as opposed to mutual mistakes.
B) That the mistake resulted from a sale of goods, as opposed to the provision of services, and that courts are more likely to grant relief for a mistake when actual physical work is not involved.
C) That because a bilateral contract, as well as a unilateral mistake was involved, most courts would grant relief.
D) That the mistake resulted from an accidental clerical error and that it would be unconscionable to enforce the contract.
E) That duress was involved because of Selma's wrongful behavior.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It permits the party that was misled by the false statement to rescind the contract, but damages are not available.
B) It permits the party who made the false statement to rescind the contract.
C) It permits either the party that was misled by the false statement or the party who made the false statement to rescind the contract.
D) The contract is automatically void and of no effect, and the party who was misled may recover damages.
E) It permits either the party that was misled by the false statement or the party who made the false statement to rescind the contract, and it also makes the contract void and of no effect.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Wrongful
B) Innocent
C) False
D) Misleading
E) Illegal
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Because it determines which contracts are considered fraudulent.
B) Because it determines which contracts are voidable.
C) Because it determines which contracts lack consideration.
D) Because it determines how much may be awarded in damages under a contract.
E) Because it determines whether punitive damages may be awarded.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Unmarketable
B) Unchargeable
C) Void
D) Illegal
E) Voidable
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Tony may rescind the contract on grounds of fraud.
B) Tony may rescind the contract on grounds of misappropriation of name or likeness.
C) Tony may rescind the contract on grounds of duress.
D) Tony may rescind the contract on grounds of defamation.
E) Tony may not rescind the contract because truth is involved.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) He will not be able to rescind the contract because Weaver made no affirmative statements.
B) He will not be able to rescind the contract unless he can prove that he expressly asked Weaver if the mileage was run backwards on the car, and Weaver failed to reveal that the odometer had been altered.
C) He will not be able to rescind the contract because the mileage alteration did not affect the engine of the car.
D) He will be able to rescind the contract because of duress practiced by Weaver.
E) He will be able to rescind the contract because of the fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of Weaver.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Negligent misrepresentation
B) Fraudulent misrepresentation
C) Scienter misrepresentation
D) Acknowledged misrepresentation
E) True misrepresentation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Uphold
B) Confirm
C) Rescind
D) Refute
E) Disclaim
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) An outrageous contract
B) An out-of-bounds contract
C) An adhesion contract
D) An untrue contract
E) An unaffirming contract
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on a mutual mistake of fact.
B) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on the mother's fraud.
C) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on either a mutual mistake of fact or based on the mother's fraud.
D) That the agreement to pay $5 million could not be rescinded because Jordan was aware of a question about his parentage.
E) That the agreement to pay $5 million could not be rescinded because Jordan waited too long in which to complain about the contract.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 67
Related Exams