A) The federal government sets national standards for municipal solid waste landfills.
B) The federal government provides technical assistance to the states for the management of nonhazardous waste.
C) The federal government provides financial assistance to the states for the management of nonhazardous waste.
D) The federal government requires that each state has a solid waste management plan that must include provisions for encouraging resource conservation or recovery.
E) Managing nonhazardous solid waste is the responsibility of the federal government, not the states.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The National Air Quality Act
B) The Federal Air Quality Act
C) The Clean Air Act
D) The Ambient Quality Air Act
E) The Uniform Air Quality Standards
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Clean-Up fund
B) Hazardous duty fund
C) Superfund
D) Primary payment source
E) Secondary payment source
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The court determined that the agency's production of an environmental assessment and its finding of no significant impact satisfied the agency's minimal burden to justify forgoing the environmental impact statement.
B) The court determined that the agency's production of an environmental assessment and its finding of no significant impact satisfied the agency's minimal burden but that the agency was required to go beyond its minimal burden in order to meet environmental standards and that an environmental impact statement was required.
C) The court determined that the agency's refusal to conduct an environmental impact statement resulted in its failure to meet even minimal standards, and that the agency was required to reconsider the matter and prepare an environmental impact statement.
D) The court determined that while under certain circumstances the agency may forego an environmental impact statement, the plaintiff established that the agency in the present case failed to fully discuss why no adverse environmental effect was at issue which is necessary in order to forego a full environmental impact statement.
E) The court refused to reach the issue of whether a full environmental impact statement was needed because the plaintiff lacked standing to sue.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
B) The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
C) The Federal Hazardous Waste Act
D) The Hazardous Waste Disposal Act
E) The Authorized Disposal Waste Act
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
B) The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
C) The Federal Hazardous Waste Act
D) The Hazardous Waste Disposal Act
E) The Authorized Disposal Waste Act
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Technology-driven
B) Technology forcing
C) Application assuming
D) Invention dependant
E) There are no regulations passed without known technology to implement them because such regulations would be unconstitutional.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Three years
B) Two years
C) Eighteen months
D) Twelve months
E) Nine months
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) Failure states
B) Marginal areas
C) Nonattainment areas
D) Misguided states
E) Sick states
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, he is correct.
B) No, he is incorrect because either the federal government or state environmental agencies may enforce the Clean Air Act.
C) No, he is incorrect because only the states may enforce the Clean Air Act.
D) No, he is incorrect because only the states or individuals may enforce the Clean Air Act.
E) No, he is incorrect because the federal government, individuals, or state environmental agencies may enforce the Clean Air Act regulations involving carbon monoxide emissions.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, he is correct.
B) No, he is incorrect; and criminal penalties include the provision that parties who knowingly violate the act can be subject to criminal fines of up to $1 million per day, and corporate officers are also potentially subject to imprisonment for up to two years for violating certain provisions of the act.
C) No, he is incorrect; and criminal penalties include the provision that parties who knowingly violate the act can be subject to criminal fines of up to $1 million per day, and corporate officers are also potentially subject to imprisonment for up to five years for violating certain provisions of the act.
D) No, he is incorrect; and criminal penalties include the provision that parties who knowingly violate the act can be subject to criminal fines of up to $1 million per month, and corporate officers are also potentially subject to imprisonment for up to two years for violating certain provisions of the act.
E) No, he is incorrect; and although violators are not subject to imprisonment under the act, parties that knowingly violate the act can be subject to criminal fines of up to $1 million per day.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Court found that petitioners' claims alleging defective design were essentially a "disguised" failure-to-warn claim and therefore preempted.
B) The Court found that federal law preempted all the plaintiffs' claims because they essentially requested that the defendant alter its product label.
C) The Court ruled that FIFRA does not preclude states from providing a remedy to those injured as a result of a manufacturer's violation of FIFRA's labeling requirements.
D) The Court ruled that while an attempt to require that the defendant change its label was allowed under FIFRA, a claim for monetary damages was preempted.
E) The Court ruled that while the plaintiffs could proceed with claims of fraud, all other claims were preempted.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, an action for nuisance.
B) Yes, an action for trespass.
C) Yes, an action for annoyance.
D) A common law action for environmental assault would be available but only if Paula could establish personal injury.
E) A common law action for environmental assault would be available but only if Paula could establish personal injury and also reduced property value.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The number and type of jobs the project would create.
B) Expected short-term profit of the project.
C) Expected profit of the project over a five-year span.
D) Alternatives to the proposed action.
E) The number of federal contractors involved along with a projection on the effect of the local economy.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Removal
B) Remedial
C) Reclamation
D) Redemption
E) Reallocation
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Identified
B) Point
C) Specific
D) Specified
E) Standard
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Kyoto Agreement
B) The Treaty for Amazonian Cooperation
C) The Greenhouse Reduction Treaty
D) The Global Warming Agreement
E) The Global Protection Treaty
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 65
Related Exams