A) Content validity
B) Criterion-related validity
C) Construct validity
D) Object validity
E) Performance validity
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A plaintiff is not required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim.
B) A plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on any sexual discrimination or sexual harassment claim.
C) A plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim unless an independent witness can corroborate on an objective basis that sexual harassment actually occurred.
D) A plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim unless the plaintiff can show that the harassment caused the plaintiff monetary harm in the form of lost wages because of inability to work.
E) A plaintiff is only excused from showing a tangible psychological injury in a claim involving sexual harassment if the plaintiff can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that severe and pervasive harassment frequently occurred.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That tangible psychological injury is necessary in order to prevail in a sexual harassment case under Title VII.
B) That whether the victim subjectively perceived the work environment to be abusive and suffered psychological injury is irrelevant to whether a violation of Title VII based on sexual harassment occurred.
C) That so long as the environment would reasonably be perceived, and is perceived, as hostile or abusive, there is no need for it also to be psychologically injurious.
D) That courts should apply a precise mathematical test as prescribed in the case in order to determine whether psychological damages are available.
E) That whether the conduct at issue is physically threatening is the determining factor on the issue of whether psychological damages are available.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Disparate-treatment cases
B) Disparate-impact cases
C) Sexual harassment cases
D) All of these
E) Quid pro quo cases
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Content validity
B) Criterion-related validity
C) Construct validity
D) Object validity
E) Performance validity
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That same sex harassment states a claim under Title VII only if the harasser is a homosexual.
B) That same sex harassment may never state a claim under Title VII.
C) That same sex harassment may state a claim in the male to male context but not in the female to female context.
D) That same sex harassment may state a claim under Title VII.
E) That same sex harassment may state a claim only if there was also involvement by at least one person of the opposite sex in the harassment.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Attorney fees are always awarded to the prevailing party in Title VII cases.
B) Similar to attorney fees in a motor vehicle accident lawsuit, attorney fees are never awarded to the prevailing party in Title VII cases.
C) Attorney fees may be awarded to a successful plaintiff in a Title VII case and are typically denied only when special circumstances would render the award unjust, but attorney fees are not awarded to prevailing defendant.
D) Attorney fees are not awarded to prevailing plaintiff; but if it is determined that a plaintiff's action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, the courts may award attorney fees to the prevailing defendant.
E) Attorney fees may be awarded to a successful plaintiff in a Title VII case and are typically denied only when special circumstances would render the award unjust; and if it is determined that a plaintiff's action was frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, the courts may award attorney fees to the prevailing defendant.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) If he can prove that he also requires males to be of a certain type, then that is a bona fide occupational qualification; and Groucho can require that of Gracie with a resulting discharge.
B) Groucho will only prevail on a defense of bona fide occupational qualification if he can establish that he has an established history of requiring skinny servers and that he did not single out Gracie.
C) Groucho will only prevail on a defense of bona fide occupational qualification if he can establish that Gracie was attempting to voluntarily get pregnant.
D) Groucho will not prevail on a defense of bona fide occupational qualification because it is available in cases involving religion and national origin only.
E) Groucho will lose because pursuant to the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) of 1987, an employer may not force a woman to take time off work during her pregnancy.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Women are not allowed to drive.
B) Women constitute only 25 percent of Saudi Arabia's workforce.
C) The law limits the industries in which women can be employed.
D) Women are forbidden to receive business licenses if they may have to interact with males or government officials.
E) Places of employment are segregated by sex.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Front pay
B) Statutory pay
C) Back pay
D) Mandated pay
E) Employment-based pay
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) A termination of claim letter
B) A reinstatement letter
C) A referral letter
D) A right-to-sue letter
E) A delineation letter
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Quid pro quo.
B) Hostile work environment.
C) Sexual discrimination.
D) Targeted.
E) None because at that point she had not physically touched him in any manner.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke, but it does not address the hiring of those who smoke.
B) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing or from refusing to hire employees who smoke.
C) There is a federal law specifically prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke and from refusing to hire employees who smoke, and it also requires that employers have a designated smoking area.
D) There is no federal law prohibiting employers from firing employees who smoke although some states have laws protecting rights of smokers.
E) Neither federal nor state laws prohibit employers from firing employees who smoke.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 60
B) 50
C) 45
D) 40
E) 35
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Showing 1 - 20 of 65
Related Exams